Friday, October 20, 2023


Bing Crosby was, along with Louis Armstrong, one of the fathers of jazz-influenced singing. He was a crooner like Rudy Vallee and Russ Columbo but with the rhythmic panache of a jazzman. In the 1930s, "The Old Groaner," as Bing was affectionately known, was the biggest singing star in America. Like the rest of the country, a young Frank Sinatra was charmed by Crosby's many radio appearances and his ultra-relaxed way with a song. When he was nineteen, he finally saw Bing in person—and the brouhaha that accompanied being a pop music star—and Sinatra knew he was going to be a singer.

In his early years, he made particular efforts not to sound like Bing. "Every kid on the block was boo-boo-booing like Crosby," he said, with the result being that there were as many differences between the two singers as there were similarities. Although Sinatra soon achieved Crosby's warmth of tone—especially on his Columbia recordings of the 1940s -- he rarely matched Bing's relaxed style.

This is clear when you compare his 1941 recording of "You Lucky People, You" to Crosby's performance of the song from the soundtrack to the film Road To Zanzibar. Where Sinatra makes relatively heavy weather of Jimmy Van Heusen's elaborate little melody—pulling away from the beat to make sense of the phrasing—Crosby breezes through the line with insouciant swing, and it makes perfect sense.

Sinatra would learn later to relax on rhythmic lines, but even then his swing remained edgier than Crosby's. "I believed, because of his leisurely manner of working, that if he could do it, I could do it," Sinatra said in the mid-1950s. "The funny thing is that I've never been able to do it. It's just a trick he has, a wonderful relaxed feeling about performing."

Nelson Riddle had a slightly different take on the differences between the rhythms of the two men, "Sinatra digs into a song and tries to get into it," he noted. "Crosby has a calculated nonchalance. He tosses off a tune". This made for terrific rhythmic bounce and cheerful irony, but when contrasted with the vulnerability and poignancy that the volatile Sinatra could achieve with a song, there could be a certain emotional distance in Crosby's work, as there apparently was in his life. Crosby was the original cool singer; Sinatra was the opposite of cool, as a man and as an artist. And Crosby recognized the difference himself: "He creates a mood, which very few people are able to do," Bing once said of Frank. "I don't think I create a mood when I sing."

The two men had different voices, too, and different approaches to them. Crosby rarely ventured from his smooth baritone range to indulge in bravura finishes or extremity of tone. Sinatra not only learnt to make more than Crosby of the expressive "grain" in his voice but would also, at various times in his career, venture to extremes, bringing startling drama to the music, as he did with the high F of "All Or Nothing At All" in 1939 and the low E of "Ol' Man River" in 1963. "Sinatra's voice is more 'live' and vibrant and fraught with shadows and coloring than Crosby's voice," Riddle observed.

Sinatra was always quick to pay tribute to Crosby, saying in the 1940s, "Bing was my first singing idol, and still is." The Old Groaner, meanwhile, acknowledged the rise of the Voice with the oft-quoted quip, "Frank Sinatra is the kind of singer who comes along once in a lifetime. But why did it have to be my lifetime???" He even sent an open letter of advice to the young crooner that was published in Motion Picture: Hollywood Magazine in December 1943. "Keep riding that skyrocket you're on, Frankie! I'm all for you," it said. "Yes, when I heard the whispers about you and me being bitter rivals, I just smiled."

Though entirely different temperamentally and for much of their careers politically, the two singers remained friendly throughout their lives, with Sinatra even singing the old man to his Reprise label in 1962, casting him in the Reprise Musical Repertory Theatre projects and the movie Robin And The 7 Hoods. Their professional encounters, mostly on radio and then TV, were never less than amiable, and their "Well, Did You Evah" duet in the movie High Society was a magical glimpse of the singers' respective performance styles!


  1. Sinatra is in a class by-himself.

  2. Enjoyed this look at Sinatra and Crosby, David. I've always been a Sinatra fan myself, but it was interesting to read more about Bing.

  3. Crosby vs. Sinatra! Now we're talking!

    You can't ignore that Sinatra was a gifted singer, and by all accounts exacting not only in his performance but in every element of it.

    There is a LOT of what Sinatra did that really is superb.

    BUT, I have never understood why Sinatra has become "THE" representation for this genre of music and why HE is remembered while other singers popular during his career are almost completely forgotten!

    I think Matt Monro and Perry Como are better singers that Sinatra. Como of course is smooth and relaxed like Bing. Monro has one of the most beautiful voices put to record but could also swagger when it was called for.

    Why aren't THEY better remembered or appreciated?

    And Bing? If it wasn't for Christmas poor Bing might be completely forgotten by today's generation!

    In the case of Bing, I would argue that there are two factors at play.

    The first is a lot of Bing's output is before the 1950's and "sonically" just don't have the same sound as stuff recorded later. There is a lot of stuff recorded from the 1950's on that STILL sounds great today but the older recordings just don't have the same depth to them.

    The second, is that by the 1950's Bing had been THE premier singer for two decades, and for a variety of reasons, he wasn't focused on his recording career the way that Sinatra was focused on his. Yes, Bing made records, and some damn good ones, but I don't think with the same hunger as Sinatra.

    The result is Sinatra made great records at a time where the recording technology could CAPTURE just how great these records were. Crosby doesn't have that advantage for a massive amount of his recorded works.

    And maybe there is a 3rd factor and that is Sinatra was far more selective in what he did than Bing was. I don't think Sinatra would have made a sing-a-long album, or recorded Children's albums. I think Bing's not being more selective, sort of hurt his "brand" a bit.

    Of course, this still doesn't explain why Como, Monro, Haymes, etc. aren't better remembered today!